<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brad.Berkemier.com &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brad.berkemier.com/category/tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brad.berkemier.com</link>
	<description>My place on the interwebs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:01:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Two Factor Auth &amp; The Yubikey</title>
		<link>http://brad.berkemier.com/2010/07/18/two-factor-auth-the-yubikey/</link>
		<comments>http://brad.berkemier.com/2010/07/18/two-factor-auth-the-yubikey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 04:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authentication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yubico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yubikey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brad.berkemier.com/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have now upgraded the blog to use two factor authentication for logins to the WordPress back end. Meaning, to login you have to present something you know (username/password &#8211; ho hum) and either something you have (keyfiles / SSL &#8230; <a href="http://brad.berkemier.com/2010/07/18/two-factor-auth-the-yubikey/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have now upgraded the blog to use two factor authentication for logins to the WordPress back end. Meaning, to login you have to present something you know (username/password &#8211; ho hum) and either something you have (keyfiles / SSL client certificate / one time password (OTP)) or something you are (biometrics like finger prints, iris scan, hand scan, etc). This solves a whole host of authentication problems when you only use one factor. It&#8217;s certainly not the end all, but if implemented correctly it definitely increases security to add a second (or third) factor.</p>
<p>Now typically the second factor authenticators pose a few problems. First being, I&#8217;m not an enterprise and most second factor authenticators are the realm of enterprises. Companies selling these solutions (RSA SecurID, Verisign VIP, and the like) charge a lot of money for proprietary software licenses and hardware tokens. Most biometric devices worth having aren&#8217;t portable or cheap.</p>
<div class="simplePullQuote">RSA is not going to just let you take a perusal of their source code.</div>
<p>The other problem you have with a lot of these solutions is the fact that they are VERY proprietary. RSA is not going to just let you take a perusal of their source code. Sure, we have a general idea about the algorithms and the technologies these companies employ, but we know nothing of their exact implementation. That&#8217;s fine if you can trust RSA and you or the developers you buy software from can integrate RADIUS or whatever API or protocol that these solutions require. And not to pick on RSA here, there&#8217;s a lot of other hardware OTP token providers out there.</p>
<p>Needless to say, a less expensive, more open source and portable solution was what I wanted for my personal use. It&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve been looking into for a awhile. Years ago I was very thrilled at the idea of being my own OpenID provider with backend authentication being performed with an OTP like SecurID. Of course, it wasn&#8217;t then something that was possible to do on a small, individual scale. In fact, I bemoaned this rather depressing fact on <a title="TWiT - Security Now Episode 95" href="http://twit.tv/sn95" target="_blank">episode 95 of the Security Now podcast</a> back in 2007.</p>
<p>However, the other day I finally decided to check out a solution to this sticky little problem. It&#8217;s been around for a little while, but I think their version 2 product is refined a bit that it&#8217;s now at a point where I can consider it secure. Also, there&#8217;s now enough open source people working on authentication modules and the like for it.</p>
<div id="attachment_154" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 209px"><a href="http://brad.berkemier.com/files/2010/07/3206443137_cdc035ffd5_o.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-154" title="YubiKey" src="http://brad.berkemier.com/files/2010/07/3206443137_cdc035ffd5_o-199x300.jpg" alt="YubiKey" width="199" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Yubikey, photo by Thomas Flenstad</p></div>
<p>The product I&#8217;m talking about is the <a href="http://www.yubico.com/products/yubikey/" target="_blank">Yubikey</a> from <a href="http://www.yubico.com" target="_blank">Yubico</a>. It&#8217;s actually a rather ingenious little product. It&#8217;s basically a tiny USB device that contains only a small capacitive button. There&#8217;s no display, drivers, client software, or the like. Rather, it&#8217;s a USB HID device&#8230;like a keyboard! See where they are going with this yet? All you do to generate and use an OTP is touch the button on the Yubikey. That&#8217;s it! The Yubikey spits out a fresh 128-bit blob right into the machine it&#8217;s plugged into just by sending out keyboard scan codes via USB, like any keyboard would do. For the lazy people reading (*ahem*) this is even better than SecurID because it types the code for you! It even sends the enter key afterwards to finish submitting your authentication form or dialog box for you. Talk about easy!</p>
<p>There&#8217;s some cool technical details to read about at their site or you can listen to <a href="http://twit.tv/sn145" target="_blank">Security Now episode 145</a>. But basically, I&#8217;m really loving the Yubikey model. It&#8217;s inexpensive, platform independent, and not proprietary in the least. You or anyone can implement their own Yubikey authentication, including offline authentication (useful for internal / private applications).</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said, I&#8217;ve rolled out Yubikey for my WordPress installation. I&#8217;m excited to continue the roll out into other areas such as OpenID and SSH authentication. Yubikey is affordable OTP / two factor authentication for the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brad.berkemier.com/2010/07/18/two-factor-auth-the-yubikey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even Russian Spies Need A Helpdesk</title>
		<link>http://brad.berkemier.com/2010/06/30/even-russian-spies-need-a-helpdesk/</link>
		<comments>http://brad.berkemier.com/2010/06/30/even-russian-spies-need-a-helpdesk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 03:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[espionage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sticky note]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brad.berkemier.com/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve been following the news recently, by now you&#8217;ve heard about the Russian spy ring infiltrated and formally charged by the US. The operatives spying on us make a lot of critical mistakes. Back during the cold war, spies &#8230; <a href="http://brad.berkemier.com/2010/06/30/even-russian-spies-need-a-helpdesk/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ve been following the news recently, by now you&#8217;ve heard about the Russian spy ring infiltrated and formally charged by the US. The operatives spying on us make a lot of critical mistakes.</p>
<p>Back during the cold war, spies from the USSR were notorious for their caution and yes, their use of advanced technology, to successfully pass information back and forth between operatives and the USSR. We&#8217;re talking about things like completely passive microphones powered by remote radio signals and microfiche in hollow coins. Now they are using ad-hoc 802.11 wireless networks and flaky custom software on top of Windows XP to exchange information? Really? This is like the last way I would do this! Writing passwords down on sticky notes? Pathetic! Talking to unknown Russian &#8220;operatives&#8221; for IT support who are actually US investigators? Too easy. Honestly, it all seems so amateur it makes me think if we weren&#8217;t meant to discover this ring <strong>on purpose</strong>. Food for thought.</p>
<p>Read the article linked below for more spy FAIL.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/063010-russian-spy-ring.html?page=1" target="_blank">Network World</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brad.berkemier.com/2010/06/30/even-russian-spies-need-a-helpdesk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Insider Threat</title>
		<link>http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/02/16/the-new-insider-threat/</link>
		<comments>http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/02/16/the-new-insider-threat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insider]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradberkemier.com/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not a new threat really. People inside an organization can always be a threat. It&#8217;s just that many people, some of them prominent security professionals, have been downplaying the insider threat lately in order to hype other emerging threats. &#8230; <a href="http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/02/16/the-new-insider-threat/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a new threat really. People inside an organization can always be a threat. It&#8217;s just that many people, some of them prominent security professionals, have been downplaying the insider threat lately in order to hype other emerging threats. I&#8217;m of the opinion that we&#8217;ll see insider threats rise through the year and probably into next. As the economy worsens, people who are becoming financially stressed may turn to corporate crime, or may retaliate for being laid off.</p>
<p>Prime example, <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/09/02/02/Fannie_Mae_ex_engineer_pleads_innocent_to_server_bomb_charge_1.html">news</a> <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01/29/fannie_mae_sabotage_averted/">this</a> <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/01/fannie.html">week</a> of a former Fannie Mae contractor leaving a malicious script designed to wipe out thousands of computers after he was fired for&#8230;a scripting error he made earlier in the month. Luckily they stumbled upon the script before it was set to execute. They might not have been so lucky though. Bruce Schneier <a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/02/insiders.html">has some good tips</a> about reducing the threat trusted individuals can pose.</p>
<p>In the end, you can take several measures to reduce your insider risk but you can never eliminate it entirely. At the end of the day the weakest link always comes down to people. People are sometimes dishonest, it&#8217;s simply a fact of life. Luckily for the rest of us, they seem to be a pretty small minority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/02/16/the-new-insider-threat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rubber Hose Cryptanalysis</title>
		<link>http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/02/15/rubber-hose-cryptanalysis/</link>
		<comments>http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/02/15/rubber-hose-cryptanalysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptanalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xkcd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradberkemier.com/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[via xkcd]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/security.png" alt="" /><br />
via <a href="http://xkcd.com/538/">xkcd</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/02/15/rubber-hose-cryptanalysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nmap Network Scanning Review</title>
		<link>http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/02/05/nmap-network-scanning/</link>
		<comments>http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/02/05/nmap-network-scanning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[footprinting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradberkemier.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Title: The long winded title for this book is Nmap Network Scanning: The Official Nmap Project Guide to Network Discovery and Security Scanning, but I&#8217;ll just be calling it NNS. Author: Gordon &#8220;Fyodor&#8221; Lyon Rating: ***** Bottom Line: The definitive &#8230; <a href="http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/02/05/nmap-network-scanning/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0979958717?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=bradberkcom-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0979958717"><img class="alignright" style="border: 0pt none" src="http://media.bradberkemier.com/img/amz/NmapNetworkScanning.jpg" border="0" alt="Nmap Network Scanning by Fyodor" width="123" height="160" /></a><img style="border:none !important;margin:0px !important" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=bradberkcom-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0979958717" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /><br />
<strong>Title</strong>: The long winded title for this book is <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0979958717?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=bradberkcom-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0979958717">Nmap Network Scanning: The Official Nmap Project Guide to Network Discovery and Security Scanning</a><img style="border:none !important;margin:0px !important" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=bradberkcom-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0979958717" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" />, but I&#8217;ll just be calling it NNS.<br />
<strong>Author</strong>: Gordon &#8220;Fyodor&#8221; Lyon<br />
<strong>Rating</strong>: *****<br />
<strong>Bottom Line</strong>: The definitive nmap book, for all your network scanning needs.</p>
<p>From the moment you start to read NNS, it is engaging and informative. The wealth of information contained in this book will have even hardcore nmap experts learning a thing or two about the preeminent network scanner. Of course, I expected nothing less from NNS because the author is nmap&#8217;s chief architect and programmer, Fyodor. Inside you&#8217;ll find his 11 years of network scanning experience distilled down into the ultimate nmap guide.</p>
<p>The material is presented in an engaging way, and wherever possible examples are given where the techniques described are applied in real world scenarios. The book is also littered with command line and output examples as well as diagrams. These items in addition to the text allow one to enjoy and learn from the book without having to sit in front of a command line and try every single command yourself. That said, it took me a bit of time to get through the book because I kept stopping to play with new options I&#8217;d learned. <img src='http://brad.berkemier.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>From introductory network scanning (What&#8217;s a stealth SYN scan?), to scan optimization (Why is it taking so long?!), to advanced techniques (Learn how to write your own nmap plug ins!), NNS covers the gamut. Anyone who does even occasional network scanning with nmap (And you are scanning your network on a regular basis aren&#8217;t you?) owes it to themselves to pick this one up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/02/05/nmap-network-scanning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting SANS posts</title>
		<link>http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/01/19/interesting-sans-posts/</link>
		<comments>http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/01/19/interesting-sans-posts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mistakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SANS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social engineering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradberkemier.com/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some interesting posts on the SANS Internet Storm Center blog. I&#8217;m sure these have already been posted everywhere (I saw one on delicious earlier), but it&#8217;s always good to have these kinda things to refer back to later. The first &#8230; <a href="http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/01/19/interesting-sans-posts/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some interesting posts on the SANS Internet Storm Center blog. I&#8217;m sure these have already been posted everywhere (I saw one on delicious earlier), but it&#8217;s always good to have these kinda things to refer back to later.</p>
<p><a title="Targeted Social Engeering via SANS ISC" href="http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5707">The first post</a> is about targeted social engineering. One of the more interesting aspects:</p>
<blockquote><p>In one incident, an attacker used phrases directly taken from a public blog, as well as a cordial greeting that the blogger had used when writing about a personal topic. This made the message significantly more authentic to the target, who duly clicked on the attachment.</p></blockquote>
<p>Pretty clever. Anything you can do to make people even subconsciously believe a message is legitimate will increase your success rate. It only takes one person to fall for it in most cases, to get a foothold that you can leverage for a deep internal attack.</p>
<p><a title=" How to Suck at Information Security via SANS ISC" href="http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5644">The other post</a> is simply a list of what NOT to do when it comes to IT security. Some of the highlights:</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Assume the users will read the security policy because you&#8217;ve asked them to.</li>
<li>Assume that policies don&#8217;t apply to executives.</li>
<li>Don&#8217;t review system, application, and security logs.</li>
<li>Expect end-users to forgo convenience in place of security.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d add a couple of my own to the list:</p>
<ul>
<li>Assume that because you&#8217;ve never been compromised you&#8217;re secure</li>
<li>Assume that you can prevent all compromises</li>
<li>Protect only the perimeter</li>
<li>Have no incident response plan</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/01/19/interesting-sans-posts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Juxtaposed</title>
		<link>http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/01/03/juxtaposed/</link>
		<comments>http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/01/03/juxtaposed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 07:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nice Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradberkemier.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#8217;t resist this juxtaposition. These cables are VSNL submarine telecommunications cables that cross the Atlantic and come above ground in the VSNL building in Avon, NJ. They are capable of carrying over an estimated 3.5 Tbps (that is terabits &#8230; <a href="http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/01/03/juxtaposed/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 474px"><img src="http://media.bradberkemier.com/img/TransAtlanticCablesTerminatedInAvonNJ.jpg" alt="Transatlantic Cables Terminated in Avon NJ" width="464" height="359" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Transatlantic Cables Terminated in Avon NJ</p></div>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t resist this juxtaposition. These cables are VSNL submarine telecommunications cables that cross the Atlantic and come above ground in the VSNL building in Avon, NJ. They are capable of carrying over an estimated 3.5 Tbps (that is terabits per second). Probably less from over head and my guess from the article&#8217;s figure (60,000,000 simultaneous voice calls = 60,000,000 DS0s = 60,000,000 * 64kb/s). In any case, those cables are extremely important for international communication but they look like utterly unimportant buried utility cable. Just a great photograph. Via <a href="http://www.wired.com/culture/art/multimedia/2008/01/gallery_simon?slide=10&amp;slideView=6">Wired</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brad.berkemier.com/2009/01/03/juxtaposed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
